01

李世乭参加韩国节目“李世乭的视线”时回忆人机大战，关于柯洁与AlphaGo人机大战时，时越、芈昱廷、唐韦星、陈耀烨、周睿羊等五位世界冠军团队对抗AlphaGo的比赛提出自己的观点。

韩国网友翻译原文如下：

（About Team Go against AlphaGo） 5 players are too many for the group Go game。 For 5 members， they should have been given more than 5 hours of thinking time。 The group game also requires a very comfortable place for players to discuss。 It would have been better if there were a disclosed room rather than a open place。 Then they could organize someone who sits in front of the board to put stones for them as Doctor Aja Huang did for AlphaGo。

I agree the pair game was an event match but I think the group game was different。 It was 胜负。 Nevertheless its circumstance was not very good。 Compared to a single play， was it be really a better condition for human players？ It was the question I half jokingly asked before。

And this is my personal opinion but I felt the team played this game quite casually。 It is good to enjoy the game but I could not think they really did their best。 However， wasn‘t the Team Go suggested as one of the best alternatives for human players to overcome AlphaGo？ It is a pity that the rule or the game environment were not well prepared but still， shouldn’t they have tried everything they could in a given set of circumstances？ Ke Jie was the representative of human but they also represented the professional Go players。 Media reported that even the cooperation of human champions could not overcome AlphaGo。 However， the game was too messy to say it was their best。 （Caster： Lee 9 dan， are you angry？） Yes。

中文翻译如下：

（关于五位世界冠军组团对抗AlphaGo的比赛）

5个人对于围棋团队来说太多了。因为有5位棋手，他们有超过5小时的思考时间，并且获得了一个很舒适的讨论环境。但是如果在一个封闭的环境或许比公开的环境更好。他们可以安排一个人在棋盘前摆棋，像黄博士替AlphaGo落子那样。

我同意两人对战是匹配的，但是多人对战则不同。那就是胜负。尽管环境很不好。与单人对局相比，难道团队对战对棋手来说真的是更好的规则吗？这个是我之前半开玩笑提出的问题。

这是我个人的观点但是我感觉这个团队对战确实有些漫不经心。团队对战能够很好的享受比赛，但是我认为没有人能够发挥他的最好水平 。接受建议组成一个非传统的围棋团队就能战胜AlphaGo了吗？很遗憾比赛的规则和环境仍然不如预期。难道是因为他们在赛场没有尽他们他们所能尽最大努力吗？ 柯洁不仅代表了人类棋手，更代表了职业棋手，媒体报道即便是世界冠军的组合仍然不能战胜AlphaGo，然而这次比赛很难说是他们的最好水平。

主持人提问：李九段你感到生气吗？

李世乭回到道：是的。